data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8aed4/8aed40eb3bb5adcd4049dab674b17d7d5e0000e1" alt=""
After patching together the crater (described
previously), I noticed a deformation at the edges of the crater's upturn. Initially, I gave it little thought and blamed it on a side-effect associated with terrains with sharp edges.
However,
the subconscious mind is apparently very persistent, and a possible fix dawned on me. The four vertexes used to create the two triangles for the terrain do not (in all likelihood) line up to form a plane. The
quadrilateral create by the points
A,B,C and
D is divided into two triangles using either the diagonal
AC or the diagonal
BD. In the terrain construction, the same diagonal is always chosen. The picture above illustrates the consequence -- the edges of the crater is very jagged.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a8bcc/a8bcc870d9d11e55fc2bed84d49a6371f35553f7" alt=""
Instead of a fixed choice, a better result is obtained when the diagonal is chosen with more care. Here is the rule I applied: take the diagonal that is the highest. This means that the quadrilateral will be always be convex (as seen from the outside) -- and some concave aspects of the generated terrain will disappear. In other words the terrain will have less jagged edges. To compute the
highest diagonal I take the diagonal that has the largest sum of the
Y component of its vertexes. Other methods also seem reasonable: for instance take the diagonal with the highest
Y. The second picture shows the same view as the first using the
largest sum method. Definitely a
noticeable improvement.